Visst är nog inte X-T3 rätt kamera för rena sportfotografer (de kör nog hellre en snabb Canon eller Nikon DSLR, eller möjligtvis någon Sony A9), och kan ju absolut hända att A7III har något bättre AF på vissa områden (vilket är en bra referens på ett mycket lyckat kamerahus). Ser inget märkligt med det.
Däremot så vet jag inte om du med DPR menar DP Review?
För den senare är generellt extremt positiva till X-T3, och skriver iaf. så här i sin sammanfattning av den:
Overall conclusion
"The Fujifilm X-T3 is arguably the best stills/video camera on the market right now. More expensive full frame cameras will offer better still image quality and cameras with in-body image stabilization will be easier to shoot video with, but nothing offers this balance of image quality and movie capability in a single package."
"Fujifilm has taken one of our favorite sub-$2000 cameras and supercharged it. Stills-focused X-T2 owners only need upgrade if they feel held back by their current camera's AF ability, but for everyone else not bewitched by the call of full-frame, the X-T3 should be extremely tempting as a do-nearly-everything option."
Compared to its peers
"The X-T3's most direct rival is the Sony a6500: another APS-C mirrorless camera able to shoot stills and 4K video. The Fujifilm wins out comfortably, for us. Autofocus performance is broadly comparable across the two cameras (though the Sony's Eye-AF system is better), but the operation and handling of the X-T3 is much better, as are its video capabilities. You'll miss out on the in-body stabilization of the a6500, but Fujifilm's array of lenses helps make the whole system more attractive."
"The Nikon D500 is another obvious point of comparison. The DSLR would still be our choice for sports, action or wildlife photography but for most other photography, the X-T3's smaller size, higher resolution, attractive output and vastly better video make it the stronger option (though users of heavy lenses may prefer the D500's grip). Depending on your needs, the Fujifilm may have a wider choice of well-matched lenses than the Nikon."
"Putting up more fierce competition is the Sony a7 III which, for a fair chunk more money, offers the step up in image quality that full-frame can bring, as well as in-body image stabilization and a larger grip. The X-T3 is arguably nicer to shoot and actually out-performs the 8-bit video of the Sony but it can't compete with its image quality or fully match the Sony's AF performance. However, the Fujifilm is less expensive and smaller, especially if you factor in the lenses you might want, so it depends on your priorities."
"The X-T3's impressive video puts it into competition with the Panasonic GH5 and GH5S. The Panasonic pair certainly have better video support features (waveform display, uploadable LUTs for corrected displays, shutter angle control, 4:2:2 internal capture), but the Eterna color mode, along with the ability to shoot 10-bit at 60p are powerful counter-arguments. The larger sensor and more dependable AF even give the X-T3 the edge in some respects. And if you want to shoots stills too, it's a clear win to the Fujifilm."
Totalt sätt så får X-T3 Guldmedalj, vilket är ett gott betyg, och liknande nivå som just A7III fick (också den en mycket bra och fin kamera väl värd det betyget).
Tex. A6500 fick Silvermedalj i jämförelse med både X-T3 och A7III (sedan kanske man inte skall hänga upp sig för mycket på det, men för att kontra den bild som du ger av hur DPReview ger för omdöme om kameran).
Absolut inte ett kamerahus som är bäst på allt, eller för alla (vilken kamera är det?), men verkar ha lyckats ganska bra om man vill ha en balanserad kamera. Speciellt om man är ute efter en som är i APS-format och spegellös.
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilm-x-t3/11
