Jo, de har bildstabilisering i vissa objektiv men inte i kamerahuset. Generellt är stabilisering i objektiven mest effektivt, förutom för vidvinklar. Men bäst är en kombination av stabilisering i objektiv och kamerahus.

Hej, jag vet hur oerhört effektiv Olympus stabilisering är, även på relativt långa brännvidder, har en Panasonic 35-100 utan inbyggd stab. o det funkar kanon ihop, men på längre är det som du säger bättre med att ha den i optiken, eller ännu hellre tillsammans med kameran. LO

På http://www.fujirumors.com/fuji-managers-ibis-not-compatible-with-x-mount-read-why-we-are-observing-the-progress-of-organic-sensor/ svarar Fuji:s chefer Takashi Ueno & Shusuke Kozaki på frågan om IBIS (bildstabilisering på sensorn).

"First of all, our XF mount is not compatible with IBIS. You may be thinking that our mount size is similar to competitors’ and why Fujifilm cannot do it. The answer is simple: for the sake of image quality.

IBIS has both advantages and disadvantages. IBIS moves the sensor in the mount to stabilize the image. To secure the amount of light at any position, the diameter of mount must cover the wider image circle considering the margin of sensor movement. The diameter of our mount was designed for the image circle without IBIS. It means the amount of light at the corners is reduced when the sensor is shifted. We could correct it digitally, but we don’t want to do it: we don’t want to compromise our image quality.

To cover the larger image circle, not only mount size (and body size), but also lens size must be bigger. We are pursuing the best balance of image quality, size and weight of both cameras and lenses, operability and performance. When we were deciding on the design of our mount, we decided to provide the best quality body and lens in comfortable small package as the best balance. And we don’t think this direction will be changed in the future. Our highest priority is always image quality. We hope you agree!"