In a digital camera i would alway slightly underexpose. Think in this way: each bucket (each photo site, or currently called pixel) has a limited size. That means that can accommodate inside a certain amount of fotons. When the bucket is full, no matter how may fotons continue to reach the...

Just for the information. I am using a program called DispCalGui. It is far the best calibration i have ever used and it is ´FREE. You heard wright, free. It has many options for fotopgrapht, prepress and video with simple and very extensive tests and calibration and accepts almost any...

I agree 100% with you. In fact one can take awesome pictures with just a mobile phone. It is just a matter of knowing the tools, their limitations, their use and try to make the best of each one, right? I am not a tech freak, even if i would like to have a Sony F65 with a set of master primes...

Don't get me wrong. I have nothing against DSLRs, i love them. I just pointing out the limitations of each system. I have analysed cameras stating an 4:2:2 out through the hdmi to find that it was just numbers and not real 4:2:2 chroma subsampling. First of all: why do you want a los subsampling...

Don't be confused. Most of the cameras output 4:2:2 through the HDMI but it is just stripped zeros at the end. The 4:2:0 is done at the sensor circuit level. The fact that HDMI can transfer bigger amount of data does not mean that it is a real 4:2:2 signal. Just make a test, grab a frame with...

Of course this is an ovresimplification of the issue. More detailed explanation to come :-)

All the Dslr cameras are great for general filming, but, if you are into filming there are not the right tools. Don't get me wrong, i love them and i use a lot for for filming but, even using enhancements like magic lantern, the dslrs are very limited in many ways. Just to name a few, the dslrs...